|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
- Lecturers: Bernd Gärtner, Joachim Giesen, Emo Welzl
- Assistant: Andreas Razen
- IFW B48.2 / Tel: (044) 632 74 22. e-mail: arazen@inf.ethz.ch
The course is concerned with approximate geometric methods for the analysis of large data sets represented by point clouds.
Data is being collected in order to draw conclusions from it, i.e. to discover relations, make extrapolations into the future, etc. More often than not, data comes as a set or sequence of points describing objects, with each coordinate representing some quantification of some feature. On a computer such data is just a sequence of 0's and 1's; the need to analyze and "understand" it calls for means to support the process. One way is to visualize the data. For example, a data set representing a number of people by their respective heights and weights can be drawn as a point set in the plane, and this drawing may reveal some correlation that could be approximated by a linear function.
For a wide range of applications (brain research, robotics, statistics, bioinformatics, character and speech recognition, computer graphics etc.) this approach is too simplistic, for various reasons. First of all, the size of the data may be huge (in the millions and billions, and sometimes so huge that we cannot even store it). And secondly, objects may have many features, giving rise to sets of dimension in the hundreds - and we know that simple visualization methods tend to fail starting in dimension 4. (Many features may in fact be redundant, but it is part of the endeavor to find out which ones.)
Many of the arising problems appear to be too hard to be solved exactly in an efficient fashion. The course discusses several approximate methods for the analysis of large high-dimensional data sets that have been developed over the last years in response to the issues indicated above. While we have applications in mind for the questions we address, we emphasize theoretical aspects in the solutions.
Methods we cover are random sampling, grid structures, core-sets, well separated pair decomposition, low distortion low-dimensional embeddings. Applications we address are shape and dimension analysis, nearest neighbor search, clustering etc.
Examples for specific questions arising in these applications are the following: for some point in d-space, what is its closest neighbor in the point cloud? What is the closest pair in the point cloud? What is the "best" grouping of the points in the cloud into k groups? Which subset of the point set of size k provides the "best" description of the point cloud? What is the dimensionality of the point cloud and what does dimensionality mean here? Can the point cloud be embedded into a lower-dimensional space while preserving many of its characteristics?
There is no obligation for you to solve the homework exercises, but we highly recommend that you do so. Writing the solutions up also teaches you to precisely formulate your ideas and communicate them such that others understand them. This ability is beneficial not just in mathematics but in (almost) any discipline.
Whatever you write up we will read and comment on.
Solving the exercises also helps you to prepare for the exam at the end of the course. Grading will solely be based on this oral exam (which will take place in fall 2005).
English
(Updated Lecture Notes will be available soon!! --- Old version: [PDF] [PS])
Lectures Lecture Notes
(Handout)Problems Solutions
Lecture 1
March 29
(Introduction - ANN)(See literature) [No homework] [No homework] (Apr 04) (Apr 04) (Apr 04)
Lecture 2
April 05
(ANN - Basic Geometry)[PDF] [PS] [PDF] [PS] (Apr 19) (Apr 04) (Apr 12)
Lecture 3
April 12
(Bounding volumes)[PDF] [PS] [PDF] [PS] (Apr 19) (Apr 12) (Apr 19)
Lecture 4
April 19
(Miniball-Approx.-Alg.)[PDF] [PS] [PDF] [PS] (Apr 19) (Apr 19) (Apr 26)
Lecture 5
April 26
(Quadratic Programming)[PDF] [PS] [PDF] [PS] (Apr 26) (Apr 26) (May 03)
Lecture 6
May 03
(Cuboids & Ellipsoids)[PDF] [PS] [PDF] [PS] (May 03) (May 03) (May 10)
Lecture 7
May 10
(Support Vector Machines)[PDF] [PS] [PDF] [PS] (May 31) (May 11) (May 25)
Lecture 8
May 17
(Quadtrees)(See literature) [PDF] [PS] [discussed on May 24] (May 17) (May 18) (May 24)
Lecture 9
May 24
(WSPD)(See literature) [PDF] [PS] (May 24) (May 24) (May 31)
Lecture 10
May 31
(Applications of WSPD)(See literature) [PDF] [PS] (May 31) (May 31) (Jun 07)
Lecture 11
June 07
(ε-Nets and VC-Dimension)(Material covered by Notes [No homework] [No homework] distributed on June 14) (Jun 07) (Jun 07)
Lecture 12
June 14
(Size of ε-Nets)(Handout of Lecture Notes) [PDF] [PS] (Jun 14) (Jun 13) (Jun 21)
Lecture 13
June 21
(ε-Nets - Directional width)(Material covered by Notes [PDF] [PS] below from June 28) (Jun 21) (Jun 28)
Lecture 14
June 28
(Core sets for direct. width)[PDF] [PS] [No homework] [No homework] (Jun 28) (Jun 28) (Jun 28)
For ANN (approximate the nearest neighbor) see chapter 2 and chapter 5.
For quadtrees see chapter 3.
For WSPD (well separated pairs decomposition) and its applications see chapter 4.
References from the Lecture Notes
M.Badoiu and K.L.Clarkson. Optimal core-sets for balls.
Submitted, 2002.
G.Barequet and S.Har-Peled. Efficiently approximating the minimum-volume bounding box of a point set in three dimensions
J. of Algorithms (JoA), volume 38 (1), pages 91-109, January 2001.
K.Fischer and B.Gärtner. The smallest enclosing ball of balls: combinatorial structure and algorithms.
Proceedings of the nineteenth annual symposium on Computational geometry, pages 292-301, 2003.
A.Goel, P.Indyk and K.R.Varadarajan. Reductions among high dimensional proximity problems.
Proceedings of the twelfth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, pages 769-778, 2001.
B.Schölkopf and A.Smola. Learning with Kernels.
MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 2002.
E.Welzl. Smallest Enclosing Disks (Balls and Ellipsoids).
In H.Maurer, editor, New Results and New Trends in Computer Science, volume 555 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 359-370, 1991.
A fundamental problem in computer graphic rendering is modeling how
light is reflected from surfaces. A class of functions called
bi-directional reflectance distribution functions (BRDFs)
characterize the light transport at an idealized surface point.
Traditionally researchers in graphics tried to model BRDFs by taking
the physics of light transport for real materials into account.
Another approach taken is to interpolate sample points measured
from the real BRDF for some material. Notice that this means one
either has to model or measure a BRDF for all materials involved
in the scene that is to be rendered. Matusik, Pfister, Brand and
McMillan took the sampling approach one step further.
Firstly, they sample several real BRDFs such that each measured BRDF
is represented by a high dimensional vector. The entirety of these
vectors is a point cloud in some high dimensional Euclidean space.
Then Matusik et al. apply linear and non-linear dimension reduction
techniques to this point cloud in order to obtain a low dimensional
representation that allows them to parameterize the space (manifold?)
of all BRDFs. That is, they are able to synthesize BRDFs that never
were sampled by interpolation from sampled BRDFs. Practically, they
sampled BRDFs for more then 100 materials. For every material they
had more than 20 million sample points that they compressed into a
vector with roughly four million components. The data model generated
from these vectors, i.e. from the point cloud consisting of roughly
one hundred points in a space with more than four million dimensions,
was a 15 dimensional non-linear manifold representation of the BRDF
space. The data allowed to reconstruct the measured BRDFs very accurately
(actually ten dimensions would have been sufficient for that) and to
synthesize sufficiently many new BRDFs. The experimentally found dimension
(around ten) of the BRDF space is in good accordance with the number free
parameters in BRFD models based on the physics of light transport in media.
Reference. W. Matusik, H. Pfister, M. Brand and L. McMillan.
A Data-Driven Reflectance Model.
In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2003.
In visual speech recognition pioneered by Bregler and Omohundro a video
of the speaker is used as a cue in addition to the traditional acoustic
cues. Therefore a polygon with a fixed number of nodes is fitted to the
lips of the speaker in each frame of the video. Every node of the polygon
has has coordinates which gives rise to vector whose number of components
is twice the number of nodes. These vectors form a point cloud that sample
the so called "lip space" which has to be learned. The learned manifold
is then used for tracking and extracting the lips, for interpolating
between frames in an image sequence and for providing features for speech
recognition. In their experiments Bregler and Omohundro fitted a polygon
with 40 nodes to the lips, i.e., every polygon was represented by an 80
dimensional vector. It turned out that the point cloud sampled from the
lip space (manifold?) could be described by a non-linear five dimensional
model. The cues derived from this model significantly improved the
performance of acoustic speech recognizers in degraded environments
and was also tested on a purely visual lip reader.
Reference. C. Bregler and S. M. Omohundro.
Nonlinear manifold learning for visual speech recognition
In Proceedings of ICCV 1995.
The genetic code can be decomposed into codon sequences which are
triplets of bases (U,A,G,T). Some of the 64 different triplets are
used to encode amino acids form which proteins are synthesized and
some serve other purposes. The genetic code associates a set of sibling
codons to the same amino acid, and some codons occur more frequently than
others in gene sequence. Biased codon usage seems to be property of
highly expressed genes which tend to use only a limited number of codons.
Such a bias was for example observed in fast growing prokaryotes and
eukaryotes. With every gene in a genome one can associate a 64 dimensional
vector of relative codon usage. A genome that consists of n
genes is then represented by a point cloud in 64 dimensional space.
Biologist when given a genome which exhibits a codon bias are interested
in getting reference sets of genes that characterize the bias. Carbone,
Zinoyev and Kepes devised a simple algorithm to find such reference sets
from the point cloud representing a genome.
Reference. A. Carbone, A. Zinovyev and F. Kepes.
Condon adaptation index as a measure of dominating codon bias
In Bioinformatics 19(16).
The brain is composed of large numbers of individual cells (neurons) that
communicate among themselves to solve tasks parsing image or speech or
generate accurate motor movements. Understanding how populations of cells
work together is one of the paramount problems in neuroscience. Using new
methods the activity pattern of large populations of cells can measured
on millisecond time scales. Giving rise of a stream of 512 times 512 pixel
images. Every image can be considered as a point in 512 times 512
dimensional space. Thus the stream gives rise to a point cloud. Kenet et al.
discovered that the recorded images of activity generated in the visual
cortex, without visual stimulation, resemble images of activity evoked
by oriented patterns. This observation can quantified by analyzing the
corresponding point clouds using dimension reduction techniques.
Reference. T. Kenet, D. Bibitchkov, M. Tsodyks, A. Grinvald and
A. Arieli.
Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes
In Nature 425, 2003.
(See also: Point Clouds in Imaging Science
In SIAM News 37(7), 2004.)